Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 22, Issue 1 , Pages 13-20 , February 2012

Individuals with non-specific low back pain use a trunk stiffening strategy to maintain upright posture

  • Stephanie L. Jones

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Department of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts, 110 Totman, Amherst, MA 01003, USA. Tel.: +1 413 545 1717; fax: +1 413 545 2906.
  • ,
  • Sharon M. Henry

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
  • ,
  • Christine C. Raasch

      Affiliations

    • Exponent Failure Analysis Associates, Inc., Phoenix, AZ, USA
  • ,
  • Juvena R. Hitt

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
  • ,
  • Janice Y. Bunn

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Biostatistics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA

Received 15 June 2011 ,Revised 20 October 2011 ,Accepted 20 October 2011.

  • Image Result

    Time series of joint torque responses to perturbations across all perturbation directions for two exemplar subjects; an individual with LBP (black) and an individual without a history of LBP (gray). S

    Time series of joint torque responses to perturbations across all perturbation directions for two exemplar subjects; an individual with LBP (black) and an individual without a history of LBP (gray). Sagittal plane torques of the trunk and left hip, knee and ankle are presented in response to predominately forward or backward perturbations (unshaded). Frontal plane torques of the trunk, and left hip and ankle are presented in response to primarily lateral perturbations (shaded). Traces range from 250ms prior to platform perturbation to 1000ms post-perturbation onset on the horizontal axis (vertical line represents the onset of platform movement) and ±50nm on the vertical axis. Schematic stick figures (depicted with the figure facing to the right for the sagittal plane views and viewed from the back for the frontal plane views) demonstrate the resulting direction of body sway and the dominant torque demonstrated at each joint for each of the cardinal directions. The boxed inset contains a displacement (cm) vs. time (ms) trace for platform movement during a rightward (0°) perturbation, as determined by the force plate kinematic markers.

  • Image Result
    Peak joint torque responses in the sagittal and frontal planes at the trunk (a), and left lower limb (b, hip; c, knee; and d, ankle). Polar plots depict group means of the absolute values of normalize

    Peak joint torque responses in the sagittal and frontal planes at the trunk (a), and left lower limb (b, hip; c, knee; and d, ankle). Polar plots depict group means of the absolute values of normalized peak torque magnitudes comparing individuals with LBP (black circles) and without LBP (NLBP; gray circles). All joints demonstrated significant main effects of direction (P<0.01). Trends or significant main effects for group differences () are indicated by superscripts.

  • Image Result
    Average normalized trunk muscle activity for the 100–175ms epoch following platform perturbations. Polar plots depict group means of the muscles of the left ventral (left panel) and left dorsal (right

    Average normalized trunk muscle activity for the 100–175ms epoch following platform perturbations. Polar plots depict group means of the muscles of the left ventral (left panel) and left dorsal (right panel) trunk comparing individuals with LBP (black circles) and without LBP (NLBP; gray circles). Significant group effects (P<0.05) are denoted by #. Inset depicts normalized, rectified, filtered EMG traces for two exemplar participants (LBP, black; NLBP, gray) in response to a forward (90°) perturbation; shaded area corresponds to 100–175ms epoch of interest.

  • Image Result
    Average normalized Tibialis Anterior and Gastrocnemius muscle activity for the 100–175ms epoch following platform perturbations. Polar plots depict group means comparing individuals with LBP (black ci

    Average normalized Tibialis Anterior and Gastrocnemius muscle activity for the 100–175ms epoch following platform perturbations. Polar plots depict group means comparing individuals with LBP (black circles) and without LBP (NLBP; gray circles). Both muscles demonstrated significant direction and group effects (P<0.05).

PII: S1050-6411(11)00168-4

doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.10.006

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 22, Issue 1 , Pages 13-20 , February 2012