Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 20, Issue 6 , Pages 1107-1114 , December 2010

Distribution of motor unit potential velocities in the biceps brachii muscle of sprinters and endurance athletes during short static contractions at low force levels

  • Ewa G. Klaver-Król

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Ziekenhuis Groep Twente, Geerdinksweg 141, Hengelo, The Netherlands
    • Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Institute of Neurology, University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Ziekenhuis Groep Twente, Geerdinksweg 141, P.O. Box 546, 7550 AM Hengelo, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 74 2436 417; fax: +31 74 2905 599.
    • ,
  • Nizare R. Henriquez

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Ziekenhuis Groep Twente, Geerdinksweg 141, Hengelo, The Netherlands
    • ,
  • Sebe J. Oosterloo

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Behavioral Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
    • ,
  • Peter Klaver

      Affiliations

    • Children’s University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    • ,
  • Harm Kuipers

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, University Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
    • ,
  • Machiel J. Zwarts

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Institute of Neurology, University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    • Epilepsiecentrum Kempenhaeghe, Heeze, The Netherlands

Received 9 July 2009 ,Revised 19 May 2010 ,Accepted 19 May 2010.

References 

  1. Andreassen S, Arendt-Nielsen L. Muscle fibre conduction velocity in motor units of the human anterior tibial muscle: a new size principle parameter. J Physiol. 1987;391:561–571
  2. Blijham PJ, ter Laak HJ, Schelhaas HJ, van Engelen BG, Stegeman DF, Zwarts MJ. Relation between muscle fiber conduction velocity and fiber size in neuromuscular disorders. J Appl Physiol. 2006;100:1837–1841
  3. Bouchard C, Boulay MR, Simoneau JA, Lortie G, Perusse L. Heredity and trainability of aerobic and anaerobic performances. An update. Sports Med. 1988;5:69–73
  4. Brooks G, Fahey T, Baldwin K. Principles of skeletal muscle adaptation. In:  Brooks G,  Fahey T,  Baldwin K editor. Exercise physiology: human bioenergetics and its applications. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005;p. 430–455
  5. Buchthal F, Dahl K, Rosenfalck P. Rise time of the spike potential in fast and slowly contracting muscle of man. Acta Physiol Scand. 1973;87:261–269
  6. Burke RE, Levine DN, Tsairis P, Zajac FE. Physiological types and histochemical profiles in motor units of the cat gastrocnemius. J Physiol. 1973;234:723–748
  7. De Luca CJ. Control properties of motor units. J Exp Biol. 1985;115:125–136
  8. De Luca CJ, LeFever RS, McCue MP, Xenakis AP. Behaviour of human motor units in different muscles during linearly varying contractions. J Physiol. 1982;329:113–128
  9. Farina D, Falla D. Effect of muscle-fiber velocity recovery function on motor unit action potential properties in voluntary contractions. Muscle Nerve. 2008;37:650–658
  10. Gantchev N, Kossev A, Gydikov A, Gerasimenko Y. Relation between the motor units recruitment threshold and their potentials propagation velocity at isometric activity. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;32:21–28
  11. Gollnick PD, Armstrong RB, Saubert CW, Piehl K, Saltin B. Enzyme activity and fiber composition in skeletal muscle of untrained and trained men. J Appl Physiol. 1972;33:312–319
  12. Goswami A, Sadhukhan AK, Gupta S. EMG characteristics and fibre composition: study on rectus femoris of sprinters and long distance runners. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2001;45:497–501
  13. Henneman E, Somjen G, Carpenter DO. Excitability and inhibitability of motoneurons of different sizes. J Neurophysiol. 1965;28:599–620
  14. Hogrel JY, Duchene J, Marini JF. Variability of some SEMG parameter estimates with electrode location. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1998;8:305–315
  15. Houtman CJ, Stegeman DF, Van Dijk JP, Zwarts MJ. Changes in muscle fiber conduction velocity indicate recruitment of distinct motor unit populations. J Appl Physiol. 2003;95:1045–1054
  16. Hunter SK, Ryan DL, Ortega JD, Enoka RM. Task differences with the same load torque alter the endurance time of submaximal fatiguing contractions in humans. J Neurophysiol. 2002;88:3087–3096
  17. Kernell D. Muscle unit properties and specialization. In:  Kernell D editors. The motoneurone and its muscle fibres. Oxford University Press; 2006;p. 29–65
  18. Klaver-Król EG, Henriquez NR, Oosterloo SJ, Klaver P, Bos JM, Zwarts MJ. Distribution of motor unit potential velocities in short static and prolonged dynamic contractions at low forces: use of the within-subject’s skewness and standard deviation variables. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007;101:647–658
  19. Komi PV. Strength and power in sport. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1992;
  20. Kukulka CG, Clamann HP. Comparison of the recruitment and discharge properties of motor units in human brachial biceps and adductor pollicis during isometric contractions. Brain Res. 1981;219:45–55
  21. Kutner MH, Nachtsheim LC, Neter J, Li W. Applied linear statistical models. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin; 2005;p. 1140–41
  22. Lange F, Van Weerden TW, Van Der Hoeven JH. A new surface electromyography analysis method to determine spread of muscle fiber conduction velocities. J Appl Physiol. 2002;93:759–764
  23. MacGillis C, Semmler J, Jacobi J, Enoka R. Motor unit discharge differs with intensity and type of isometric contraction performed with the elbow flexor muscles. Med Sci Sport Exer. 2003;35:S280
  24. Maluf KS, Shinohara M, Stephenson JL, Enoka RM. Muscle activation and time to task failure differ with load type and contraction intensity for a human hand muscle. Exp Brain Res. 2005;167:165–177
  25. Masuda T, Sadoyama T. Skeletal muscles from which the propagation of motor unit action potentials is detectable with a surface electrode array. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1987;67:421–427
  26. Merletti R, Rainoldi A, Farina D. Surface electromyography for noninvasive characterization of muscle. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2001;29:20–25
  27. Morimoto S, Masuda M. Dependence of conduction velocity on spike interval during voluntary muscular contraction in human motor units. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1984;53:191–195
  28. Mottram CJ, Jakobi JM, Semmler JG, Enoka RM. Motor-unit activity differs with load type during a fatiguing contraction. J Neurophysiol. 2005;93:1381–1392
  29. Nandedkar SD, Stalberg EV, Sanders DB. Simulation techniques in electromyography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1985;32:775–785
  30. Nishizono H, Saito Y, Miyashita M. The estimation of conduction velocity in human skeletal muscle in situ with surface electrodes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1979;46:659–664
  31. Nishizono H, Kurata H, Miyashita M. Muscle fiber conduction velocity related to stimulation rate. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989;72:529–534
  32. Philippou A, Bogdanis GC, Nevill AM, Maridaki M. Changes in the angle-force curve of human elbow flexors following eccentric and isometric exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004;93:237–244
  33. Rainoldi A, Gazzoni M, Melchiorri G. Differences in myoelectric manifestations of fatigue in sprinters and long distance runners. Physiol Meas. 2008;29:331–340
  34. Rudroff T, Poston B, Shin IS, Bojsen-Moller J, Enoka RM. Net excitation of the motor unit pool varies with load type during fatiguing contractions. Muscle Nerve. 2005;31:78–87
  35. Sadoyama T, Masuda T, Miyano H. Optimal conditions for the measurement of muscle fibre conduction velocity using surface electrode arrays. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1985;23:339–342
  36. Sadoyama T, Masuda T, Miyata H, Katsuta S. Fibre conduction velocity and fibre composition in human vastus lateralis. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1988;57:767–771
  37. Sollie G, Hermens HJ, Boon KL, Wallinga-De Jonge W, Zilvold G. The measurement of the conduction velocity of muscle fibres with surface EMG according to the cross-correlation method. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985;25:193–204
  38. Tax AA, Denier van der Gon JJ, Gielen CC, van den Tempel CM. Differences in the activation of m. biceps brachii in the control of slow isotonic movements and isometric contractions. Exp Brain Res. 1989;76:55–63
  39. Thomis MA, Beunen GP, Maes HH, Blimkie CJ, Van Leemputte M, Claessens AL, et al. Strength training: importance of genetic factors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30:724–731
  40. Thorstensson A. Muscle strength, fibre types and enzyme activities in man. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1976;443:1–45
  41. van der Ploeg RJ, Fidler V, Oosterhuis HJ. Hand-held myometry: reference values. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1991;54:244–247

PII: S1050-6411(10)00086-6

doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.05.008

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 20, Issue 6 , Pages 1107-1114 , December 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution