Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 21, Issue 1 , Pages 41-48 , February 2011

Effects of postural and visual stressors on myofascial trigger point development and motor unit rotation during computer work

  • Jeffrey A. Hoyle

      Affiliations

    • The Ergonomics Center of North Carolina, Edward P. Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, 3701 Neil St., Raleigh, NC 27607, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 (919) 515 8400.
  • ,
  • William S. Marras

      Affiliations

    • The Biodynamics Laboratory, Department of Industrial, Welding, and Systems Engineering, The Ohio State University, 1971 Neil Ave., 210 Baker Systems, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
  • ,
  • James E. Sheedy

      Affiliations

    • Vision Ergonomics Laboratory, College of Optometry, Pacific University, 2043 College Way, Forest Grove, OR 97116, United States
  • ,
  • Dennis E. Hart

      Affiliations

    • Adena Health System, 272 Hospital Road, Chillicothe, OH, United States

Received 18 March 2009 ,Revised 29 April 2010 ,Accepted 29 April 2010.

  • Image Result

    Depiction of three experimental conditions (from left to right, VL/PL, VH/PL, VL/PH).

    Depiction of three experimental conditions (from left to right, VL/PL, VH/PL, VL/PH).

  • Image Result

    Placement of surface electrode array (14 channels) over trapezius muscle. Channel 7 records EMG data directly over the trigger point location, as determined by myofascial specialist.

    Placement of surface electrode array (14 channels) over trapezius muscle. Channel 7 records EMG data directly over the trigger point location, as determined by myofascial specialist.

  • Image Result

    EMG analysis and FFT processing illustration to calculate the running means of the median frequencies. FFT=Fast Fourier Transform.

    EMG analysis and FFT processing illustration to calculate the running means of the median frequencies. FFT=Fast Fourier Transform.

  • Image Result

    Average median frequency cycles (across all spatial locations combined) as a function of condition. Whiskers=1 standard deviation. Results showed that all three conditions were significantly different

    Average median frequency cycles (across all spatial locations combined) as a function of condition. Whiskers=1 standard deviation. Results showed that all three conditions were significantly different from one another.

  • Image Result
    Average median frequency cycles (across all subjects) as a function of muscle spatial location (relative to MTrP). Location highlighted in red represents the MTrP location. Green (lighter) locations r

    Average median frequency cycles (across all subjects) as a function of muscle spatial location (relative to MTrP). Location highlighted in red represents the MTrP location. Green (lighter) locations represent locations that are significantly different from MTrP location (p<0.05). Grey discs indicate electrode placement while the dotted lines represent muscle striation lines.

  • Image Result
    Mean VAS scores for neck/backache (post–pre) as a function of condition. Whiskers=1 standard deviation. Results showed that VL/PL and VL/PH conditions were significantly different; however, VH/PL cond

    Mean VAS scores for neck/backache (post–pre) as a function of condition. Whiskers=1 standard deviation. Results showed that VL/PL and VL/PH conditions were significantly different; however, VH/PL condition was not significantly different from the other two conditions.

PII: S1050-6411(10)00065-9

doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.04.006

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 21, Issue 1 , Pages 41-48 , February 2011