Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 20, Issue 4 , Pages 767-772 , August 2010

Automatic detection of surface EMG activation timing using a wavelet transform based method

  • Giuseppe Vannozzi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Human Movement and Sport Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, Rome, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Department of Human Movement and Sport Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, Piazza Lauro de Bosis, 6, 00135 Rome, Italy. Tel.: +39 06 36733522; fax: +39 06 36733517.
  • ,
  • Silvia Conforto

      Affiliations

    • Department of Applied Electronics, Roma TRE University, Rome, Italy
  • ,
  • Tommaso D’Alessio

      Affiliations

    • Department of Applied Electronics, Roma TRE University, Rome, Italy

Received 15 July 2009 ,Revised 7 January 2010 ,Accepted 10 February 2010.

References 

  1. Anderson BD, Moore JB. Optimal filtering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1979;
  2. Benedetti MG. Muscle activation intervals and EMG envelope in clinical gait analysis. IEEE Eng Med Biol. 2001;20(6):33–34
  3. Benedetti MG, Bonato P, Catani F, D’Alessio T, Knaflitz M, Marcacci M, et al. Myoelectric activation pattern during gait in total knee replacement: relationship with kinematics, kinetics and clinical outcome. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1999;7(2):140–149
  4. Bogey RA, Barnes LA, Perry J. Computer algorithms to characterize individual subject EMG profiles during gait. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:835–841
  5. Bonato P, D’Alessio T, Knaflitz M. A statistical method for the measurement of muscle activation intervals from surface myoelectric signal during gait. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1998;45(3):287–299
  6. Conforto S, D’Alessio T, Pignatelli S. Optimal rejection of movement artifacts from myoelectric signals by means of a wavelet filtering procedure. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1999;9:47–57
  7. Davis A, Marshak A, Wiscombe W. Wavelet-based multifractal analysis of non-stationary and/or intermittent geophysical signals. Wavelets Geophys, Wavelet Anal Appl. 1994;4:249–298
  8. De Luca CJ. The use of surface Electromyography in Biomechanics. J Appl Biomech. 1997;13:135–163
  9. Farge M. Wavelet transforms and their applications to turbulence. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 1992;24:395–457
  10. Hodges PW, Bui BH. A comparison of computer-based methods for determination of onset of muscle contraction using electromyography. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996;101:511–519
  11. Mallat S, Hwang WL. Singularity detection and processing with wavelets. IEEE Trans Inf Theory. 1991;38(2):617–643
  12. Merlo A, Farina D, Merletti R. A fast and reliable technique for muscle activity detection from surface EMG signals. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2003;50(3):316–323
  13. Micera S, Sabatini AM, Dario P. An algorithm for detecting the onset of muscle contraction by EMG signal processing. Med Eng Phys. 1997;16:70–76
  14. Micera S, Vannozzi G, Sabatini AM, Dario P. Improving detection of muscle activation intervals. IEEE Eng Med Biol. 2001;20(6):38–46
  15. Perry J. The contribution of dynamic electromyography to gait analysis. In: Gait analysis in the science of rehabilitation. Washington, DC: Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, Dept Veterans Affairs; 1998. p. 33–48.
  16. Prilutsky BI, Gregor RJ, Ryan MM. Coordination of two-joint rectus femoris and hamstrings during the swing phase of human walking and running. Exp Brain Res. 1998;120:479–486
  17. Rioul O, Vetterli M. Wavelets and signal processing. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 1991;13–38
  18. Staude G, Flachenecker C, Daumer M, Wolf W. Onset detection in surface electromyographic signals: a systematic comparison of methods. EURASIP J Appl Signal Process. 2001;2:67–81
  19. Stulen FB, De Luca CJ. Frequency parameters of the myoelectric signal as a measure of muscle conduction velocity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1981;28:512–523

PII: S1050-6411(10)00031-3

doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.02.007

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 20, Issue 4 , Pages 767-772 , August 2010