Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 20, Issue 3 , Pages 398-405, June 2010

The role of anticipatory postural adjustments in compensatory control of posture: 2. Biomechanical analysis

  • Marcio J. Santos

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, IL 60612, United States
  • ,
  • Neeta Kanekar

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, IL 60612, United States
  • ,
  • Alexander S. Aruin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, IL 60612, United States
    • Marianjoy Rehabilitation Hospital, Wheaton, IL, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Department of Physical Therapy (MC 898), University of Illinois at Chicago, 1919 W. Taylor St. (4th floor), Chicago, IL 60612, United States. Tel.: +1 312 355 0904; fax: +1 312 996 4583.

Received 2 August 2009; received in revised form 21 November 2009; accepted 14 January 2010. published online 16 February 2010.

Abstract 

The central nervous system (CNS) utilizes anticipatory (APAs) and compensatory (CPAs) postural adjustments to maintain equilibrium while standing. It is known that these postural adjustments involve displacements of the center of mass (COM) and center of pressure (COP). The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationship between APAs and CPAs from a kinetic and kinematic perspective. Eight subjects were exposed to external predictable and unpredictable perturbations induced at the shoulder level while standing. Kinematic and kinetic data were recorded and analyzed during the time duration typical for anticipatory and compensatory postural adjustments. When the perturbations were unpredictable, the COM and COP displacements were larger compared to predictable conditions with APAs. Thus, the peak of COM displacement, after the pendulum impact, in the posterior direction reached 28±9.6mm in the unpredictable conditions with no APAs whereas it was 1.6 times smaller, reaching 17±5.5mm during predictable perturbations. Similarly, after the impact, the peak of COP displacement in the posterior direction was 60±14mm for unpredictable conditions and 28±3.6mm for predictable conditions. Finally, the times of the peak COM and COP displacements were similar in the predictable and unpredictable conditions. This outcome provides additional knowledge about how body balance is controlled in presence and in absence of information about the forthcoming perturbation. Moreover, it suggests that control of posture could be enhanced by better utilization of APAs and such an approach could be considered as a valuable modality in the rehabilitation of individuals with balance impairment.

Keywords: Postural control, Standing, External perturbations, Compensatory and anticipatory adjustments

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1050-6411(10)00003-9

doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.01.002

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 20, Issue 3 , Pages 398-405, June 2010