Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 20, Issue 4 , Pages 693-700, August 2010

Postural reactions following forward platform perturbation in young, middle-age, and old adults

  • Paulo B. de Freitas

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, Cruzeiro do Sul University, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Instituto de Ciências da Atividade Física e Esporte – ICAFE, Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul, Rua Galvão Bueno, 868, São Paulo, SP 01506-000, Brazil.
  • ,
  • Christopher A. Knight

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health, Nutrition and Exercise Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
  • ,
  • José A. Barela

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, Cruzeiro do Sul University, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Received 21 November 2008; received in revised form 30 August 2009; accepted 30 November 2009. published online 08 January 2010.

Abstract 

The aim of the study was to examine how individuals of different ages react to forward balance perturbations. Thirty-six volunteers, divided into four groups [young (YA), middle-age (MA40 and MA50), and old (OA) adults], stood on a platform that was either kept stationary, moved backward, or moved forward. EMG onset, EMG time-to-peak, iEMG, and agonist–antagonist co-activation, as well as cumulative angular excursion, maximum center of mass (CM) backward displacement, and CM time-to-reversal were assessed after forward translations. Postural synergies were assessed using principal component analysis (PCA). The results showed that OA activated their muscles later than YA [TA=25ms, RF=17ms] and OA and MA50 reached the peak of activation later than YA [MA50:TA=23ms, RF=32ms, OA:TA=28ms, RF=21ms]. Moreover, OA kept a higher level of activation longer than all younger groups. No differences among groups were observed in co-activation, kinematic, and PCA variables. We conclude that changes in temporal EMG patterns can be seen in the fifth decade. However, such changes have no effect on the CM horizontal displacement and CM time-to-reversal after perturbation, which cannot be justified by the use of different postural synergies, suggesting that temporal aspects of muscle activation could play a minor role in controlling excessive CM displacements after perturbations.

Keywords: Posture, Moving platform, Balance perturbation, EMG, Kinematics

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1050-6411(09)00176-X

doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2009.11.009

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 20, Issue 4 , Pages 693-700, August 2010