Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 20, Issue 3 , Pages 375-387 , June 2010

Methodological aspects of SEMG recordings for force estimation – A tutorial and review

  • Didier Staudenmann

      Affiliations

    • Department of Integrative Physiology, Neurophysiology of Movement Laboratory, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
    • ,
  • Karin Roeleveld

      Affiliations

    • Program for Human Movement Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
    • ,
  • Dick F. Stegeman

      Affiliations

    • Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat, 9, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud University, Nijmegen Medical Centre, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    • ,
  • Jaap H. van Dieën

      Affiliations

    • Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat, 9, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +31 20 4448501; fax: +31 20 4448529.

Received 22 December 2008 ,Revised 19 August 2009 ,Accepted 19 August 2009.

References 

  1. Adrian ED. Interpretation of the electromyogramm. Lancet. 1925;13:1229–1233
  2. Alkner BA, Tesch PA, Berg HE. Quadriceps EMG/force relationship in knee extension and leg press. Med Sci Sports Exer. 2000;32(2):459–463
  3. Allen GM, Gandevia SC, McKenzie DK. Reliability of measurements of muscle strength and voluntary activation using twitch interpolation. Muscle Nerve. 1995;18(6):593–600
  4. Bartolo A, Roberts C, Dzwonczyk RR, Goldman E. Analysis of diaphragm EMG signals: comparison of gating vs. subtraction for removal of ECG contamination. J Appl Physiol. 1996;80(6):1898–1902
  5. Basmajian JV. Research foundations of EMG biofeedback in rehabilitation. Biofeedback Self-Reg. 1988;13(4):275–298
  6. Basmajian JV, De Luca CJ. Muscles alive: their functions revealed by electromyography. 5th ed.. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1985;
  7. Bigland B, Lippold OC. The relation between force, velocity and integrated electrical activity in human muscles. J Physiol. 1954;123(1):214–224
  8. Blix M. Die länge und die spannung des muskels. Skand Arch Physiol. 1894;5:149–206
  9. Blok JH, Stegeman DF, Van Oosterom A. Three-layer volume conductor model and software package for applications in surface electromyography. Ann Biomed Eng. 2002;30:566–577
  10. Blok JH, van Dijk JP, Drost M, Zwarts MJ, Stegeman DF. A high-density multichannel surface electromyography system for the characterization of single motor units. Rev Sci Instrum. 2002;73(4):1887–1897
  11. Bobbert MF, Gerritsen KGM, Litjens MCA, Van Soest AJ. Why is countermovement jump height greater than squat jump height?. Med Sci Sports Exer. 1996;28(11):1402–1412
  12. Bodine-Fowler S, Garfinkel A, Roy RR, Edgerton VR. Spatial distribution of muscle fibers within the territory of a motor unit. Muscle Nerve. 1990;13(12):1133–1145
  13. Brereton LC, McGill SM. Frequency response of spine extensors during rapid isometric contractions: effects of muscle length and tension. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1998;8(4):227–232
  14. Brown SH, McGill SM. Co-activation alters the linear versus non-linear impression of the EMG-torque relationship of trunk muscles. J Biomech. 2008;41(3):491–497
  15. Buchanan TS, Delp SL, Solbeck JA. Muscular resistance to varus and valgus loads at the elbow. J Biomech Eng. 1998;120(5):634–639
  16. Buchthal F, Erminio F, Rosenfalck P. Motor unit territory in different human muscles. Acta Physiol Scand. 1959;45(1):72–87
  17. Burke RE, Levine DN, Tsairis P, Zajac FE. Physiological types and histochemical profiles in motor units of the cat gastrocnemius. J Physiol. 1973;234(3):723–748
  18. Carrasco DI, Lawrence J, English AW. Neuromuscular compartments of cat lateral gastrocnemius produce different torques about the ankle joint. Motor Control. 1999;3(4):436–446
  19. Cavanagh PR, Komi PV. Electromechanical delay in human skeletal muscle under concentric and eccentric contractions. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1979;42(3):159–163
  20. Chanaud EM, Pratt CA, Loab GE. A multiple-contact EMG recording array for mapping single muscle unit territories. J Neurosci Methods. 1987;21(2–4):105–112
  21. Cholewicki J, McGill SM. EMG assisted optimization: a hybrid approach for estimating muscle forces in an indeterminate biomechanical model. J Biomech. 1994;27(10):1287–1289
  22. Cholewicki J, McGill SM. Mechanical stability of the in vivo lumbar spine: implications for injury and chronic low back pain. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1996;11(1):1–15
  23. Chow RS, Medri MK, Martin DC, Leekam RN, Agur AM, McKee NH. Sonographic studies of human soleus and gastrocnemius muscle architecture: gender variability. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;82(3):236–244
  24. Christov II, Daskalov IK. Filtering of electromyogram artifacts from the electrocardiogram. Med Eng Phys. 1999;21(2):731–736
  25. Clamann HP, Robinson AJ. A comparison of electromyographic and mechanical fatigue properties in motor units of the cat hindlimb. Brain Res. 1985;327(1–2):203–209
  26. Clancy EA, Farry KA. Adaptive whitening of the electromyogram to improve amplitude estimation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2000;47(6):709–719
  27. Clancy EA, Hogan N. Multiple site electromyograph amplitude estimation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1995;42(2):203–211
  28. Clancy EA, Morin EL, Merletti R. Sampling, noise-reduction and amplitude estimation issues in surface electromyography. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2002;12(1):1–16
  29. Clark J, Plonsey R. A mathematical evaluation of the core conductor model. Biophys J. 1966;6(1):95–112
  30. Clarys JP, Cabri J. Electromyography and the study of sports movements: a review. J Sports Sci. 1993;11(5):379–448
  31. Daffertshofer A, Lamoth CJ, Meijer OG, Beek PJ. PCA in studying coordination and variability: a tutorial. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004;19(4):415–428
  32. Dahmane R, Djordjevic S, Simunic B, Valencic V. Spatial fiber type distribution in normal human muscle histochemical and tensiomyographical evaluation. J Biomech. 2005;38(12):2451–2459
  33. Day SJ, Hulliger M. Experimental simulation of cat electromyogram: evidence for algebraic summation of motor-unit action-potential trains. J Neurophysiol. 2001;86(5):2144–2158
  34. De Jong RH, Freund FG. Relation between electromyogram and isometric twitch tension in human muscle. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1967;48(10):539–542
  35. De Luca CJ, Merletti R. Surface myoelectric signal cross-talk among muscles of the leg. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1988;69(6):568–575
  36. De Luca CJ. Physiology and mathematics of myoelectric signals. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1979;26(6):313–325
  37. De Luca CJ. The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. J Appl Biomech. 1997;13(2):135–163
  38. Delp MD, Duan C. Composition and size of type I, IIA, IID/X, and IIB fibers and citrate synthase activity of rat muscle. J Appl Physiol. 1996;80(1):261–270
  39. Dennerlein JT, Diao E, Mote CD, Rempel DM. Tensions of the flexor digitorum superficialis are higher than a current model predicts. J Biomech. 1998;31:295–301
  40. Desmedt JE, Godaux E. Spinal motoneuron recruitment in man: rank deordering with direction but not with speed of voluntary movement. Science. 1981;214(4523):933–936
  41. DeVries HA. Efficiency of electrical activity as a physiological measure of the functional state of muscle tissue. Am J Phys Med. 1968;47(1):10–22
  42. Dimitrov GV, Disselhorst-Klug C, Dimitrova NA, Schulte E, Rau G. Simulation analysis of the ability of different types of multi-electrodes to increase selectivity of detection and to reduce cross-talk. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003;13(2):125–138
  43. Dimitrov GV, Dimitrova NA. Bipolar recording of potentials generated by excitable fibres in a volume conductor. Agressologie. 1977;18(5):235–252
  44. Dimitrova NA, Dimitrov GV, Nikitin OA. Neither high-pass filtering nor mathematical differentiation of the EMG signals can considerably reduce cross-talk. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2002;12(4):235–246
  45. Disselhorst-Klug C, Silny J, Rau G. Improvement of spatial resolution in surface-EMG: a theoretical and experimental comparison of different spatial filters. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1997;44(7):567–574
  46. Drake JD, Callaghan JP. Elimination of electrocardiogram contamination from electromyogram signals: an evaluation of currently used removal techniques. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2006;16(2):175–187
  47. Drost G, Stegeman DF, van Engelen BG, Zwarts MJ. Clinical applications of high-density surface EMG: a systematic review. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2006;16(6):586–602
  48. Ekstedt J, Stalberd E. How the size of the needle electrode leading-off surface influences the shape of the single muscle fibre action potential in electromyography. Comput Programs Biomed. 1973;3(4):204–212
  49. English AW, Wolf SL, Segal RL. Compartmentalization of muscles and their motor nuclei: the partitioning hypothesis. Phys Ther. 1993;73(12):857–867
  50. English AW, Carrasco DI, Widmer CG. Torques produced by different compartments of the rabbit masseter muscle. J Appl Biomech. 1999;15(4):348–360
  51. Enoka RM, Fuglevand AJ. Motor unit physiology: some unresolved issues. Muscle Nerve. 2001;24(1):4–17
  52. Falla D, Farina D. Motor units in cranial and caudal regions of the upper trapezius muscle have different discharge rates during brief static contractions. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2007;192(4):551–558
  53. Farina D. Interpretation of the surface electromyogram in dynamic contractions. Exer Sport Sci Rev. 2006;34(3):121–127
  54. Farina D, Cescon C, Merletti R. Influence of anatomical, physical, and detection-system parameters on surface EMG. Biol Cybern. 2002;86(6):445–456
  55. Farina D, Leclerc F, Arendt-Nielsen L, Buttelli O, Madeleine P. The change in spatial distribution of upper trapezius muscle activity is correlated to contraction duration. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2006;18(1):16–25
  56. Farina D, Merletti R, Enoka RM. The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG. J Appl Physiol. 2004;96(4):1486–1495
  57. Farina D, Merletti R, Indino B, Nazzaro M, Pozzo M. Surface EMG crosstalk between knee extensor muscles: experimental and model results. Muscle Nerve. 2002;26(5):681–695
  58. Farina D, Mesin L, Martina S, Merletti R. A surface EMG generation model with multilayer cylindrical description of the volume conductor. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004;51(3):415–426
  59. Feindel W. Anatomical overlap of motor-units. J Comp Neurol. 1954;101(1):1–17
  60. Feinstein B, Lindegard B, Nyman E, Wohlfart G. Morphologic studies of motor units in normal human muscles. Acta Anat (Basel). 1955;23(2):127–142
  61. Finni T, Komi PV, Lukkariniemi J. Achilles tendon loading during walking: application of a novel optic fiber technique. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998;77(3):289–291
  62. Freriks B, Hermens H, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G. The Recommendation for sensors and sensor placement procedures for surface electromyography. Deliverable 8 of SENIAM European concerted action. Enschede. The Netherlands: Roessingh Research and Development; 1999.
  63. Fuglevand AJ, Winter DA, Patla AE. Models of recruitment and rate coding organization in motor-unit pools. J Neurophysiol. 1993;70(6):2470–2488
  64. Garcia GA, Okuno R, Akazawa K. A decomposition algorithm for surface electrode-array electromyogram. A noninvasive, three-step approach to analyze surface EMG signals. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2005;24(4):63–72
  65. Garland SJ, Griffin L. Motor unit double discharge: statistical anomaly of functional entity?. Can J Appl Physiol. 1999;24(2):113–130
  66. Garnett RA, O’Donovan MJ, Stephens JA, Taylor A. Motor unit organization of human medial gastrocnemius. J Physiol. 1979;287:33–43
  67. Gath I, Stalberg E. Measurements of the uptake area of small-size electromyographic electrodes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1979;26(6):374–376
  68. Gath I, Stalberg EV. Techniques for improving the selectivity of electromyographic recordings. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1976;23(6):467–472
  69. Giroux B, Lamontagne M. Comparisons between surface electrodes and intramuscular wire electrodes in isometric and dynamic conditions. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990;30(7):397–405
  70. Godin DT, Parker PA, Scott RN. Noise characteristics of stainless-steel surface electrodes. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1991;29(6):585–590
  71. Gootzen THJM, Stegeman DF, Van Oosterom A. Finite limb dimensions and finite muscle length in a model for the generation of electromyographic signals. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991;81(2):152–162
  72. Granata KP, Marras WS. An EMG-assisted model of trunk loading during free-dynamic lifting. J Biomech. 1995;28(11):1309–1317
  73. Granata KP, Marras WS. An EMG assisted model of loads on the lumbar spine during asymmetric trunk extensions. J Biomech. 1993;26(12):1429–1438
  74. Guimaraes AC, Herzog W, Allinger TL, Zhang YT. The EMG-force relationship of the cat soleus muscle and its association with contractile conditions during locomotion. J Exp Biol. 1995;198(Pt 4):975–987
  75. Guimaraes AC, Herzog W, Hulliger M, Zhang YT, Day S. EMG-force relationship of the cat soleus muscle studied with distributed and non-periodic stimulation of ventral root filaments. J Exp Biol. 1994;186:75–93
  76. Gydikov A, Kosarov D. The influence of various factors on the shape of the myopotentials in using monopolar electrodes. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1973;13(3):319–343
  77. Hagg GM, Luttmann A, Jager M. Methodologies for evaluating electromyographic field data in ergonomics. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000;10(5):301–312
  78. Harkema SJ, Hurley SL, Patel UK, Requejo PS, Dobkin BH, Edgerton VR. Human lumbosacral spinal cord interprets loading during stepping. J Neurophysiol. 1997;77(2):797–811
  79. Harlaar J, Redmeijer RA, Tump P, Peters R, Hautus E. The SYBAR system: integrated recording and display of video, EMG, and force plate data. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2000;32(1):11–16
  80. Hatze H. Myoelectric control models of skeletal muscle-characteristics and applications; 1981.
  81. Heckathorne CW, Childress DS. Relationships of the surface electromyogram to the force, length, velocity, and contraction rate of the cineplastic human biceps. Am J Phys Med. 1981;60(1):1–19
  82. Henneman E. Relation between size of neurons and their susceptibility to discharge. Science. 1957;126(3287):1345–1347
  83. Herdmann J, Budingen HJ, Reiners K, Berger W, Freund HJ. Dependence of the action potential amplitude of motor units on the recruitment threshold: implications for electromyography. EEG EMG Z Elektroenz Elektromy Verw Geb. 1986;17(3):140–146
  84. Herrmann U, Flanders M. Directional tuning of single motor units. J Neurosci. 1998;18(20):8402–8416
  85. Herzog W, Leonard TR. The history dependence of force production in mammalian skeletal muscle following stretch–shortening and shortening–stretch cycles. J Biomech. 2000;33(5):531–542
  86. Herzog W, Sokolosky J, Zhang YT, Guimaraes AC. EMG-force relation in dynamically contracting cat plantaris muscle. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1998;8(3):147–155
  87. Hill AV. First and last experiments in muscle mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1970.
  88. Hof AL. The relationship between electromyogram and muscle force. Sportverletz Sportschaden. 1997;11(3):79–86
  89. Hof AL. Muscle mechanics and neuromuscular control. J Biomech. 2003;36(7):1031–1038
  90. Hof AL, van den Berg J. Linearity between the weighted sum of the EMGs of the human triceps surae and the total torque. J Biomech. 1977;10(9):529–539
  91. Hof AL, Van den Berg J. EMG to force processing I: an electrical analogue of the Hill muscle model. J Biomech. 1981;14(11):747–758
  92. Hof AL, Van den Berg J. EMG to force processing II: estimation of parameters of the Hill muscle model for the human triceps surae by means of a calfergometer. J Biomech. 1981;14(11):759–770
  93. Hof AL, Van den Berg J. EMG to force processing III: Estimation of model parameters for the human triceps surae muscle and assessment of the accuracy by means of a torque plate. J Biomech. 1981;14(11):771–785
  94. Hogan N, Mann RW. Myoelectric signal processing: optimal estimation applied to electromyography–Part II: experimental demonstration of optimal microprocessor performance. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1980;27(7):396–410
  95. Holtermann A, Roeleveld K, Karlsson JS. Inhomogeneities in muscle activation reveal motor unit recruitment. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2005;15(2):131–137
  96. Hoozemans MJ, van Dieen JH. Prediction of handgrip forces using surface EMG of forearm muscles. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2005;15(4):358–366
  97. Huigen E, Peper A, Grimbergen CA. Investigation into the origin of the noise of surface electrodes. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2002;40(3):332–338
  98. Huijing PA. Muscle as a collagen fiber reinforced composite: a review of force transmission in muscle and whole limb. J Biomech. 1999;32(4):329–345
  99. Hurley MV, Newham DJ. The influence of arthrogenous muscle inhibition on quadriceps rehabilitation of patients with early, unilateral osteoarthritic knees. Br J Rheumatol. 1993;32(2):127–131
  100. Ince LP, Leon MS, Christidis D. EMG biofeedback with upper extremity musculature for relaxation training: a critical review of the literature. J Behav Ther Exp Psych. 1985;16(2):133–137
  101. Inman VT, Ralston HJ. Relation of human electromyogramm to muscular tension. EEG Clin Neurophysiol. 1952;4(2):187–194
  102. Jensen C, Westgaard RH. Functional subdivision of the upper trapezius muscle during low-level activation. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1997;76(4):335–339
  103. Johnson MA, Polgar J, Weightman D, Appleton D. Data on the distribution of fibre types in thirty-six human muscles. An autopsy study. J Neurol Sci. 1973;18(4):111–129
  104. Jorgensen K, Nicholaisen T, Kato M. Muscle fiber distribution, capillary density, and enzymatic activities in the lumbar paravertebral muscles of young men. Significance for isometric endurance. Spine. 1993;18(11):1439–1450
  105. Keenan KG, Farina D, Maluf KS, Merletti R, Enoka RM. Influence of amplitude cancellation on the simulated surface electromyogram. J Appl Physiol. 2005;98(1):120–131
  106. Keenan KG, Valero-Cuevas FJ. Epoch length to accurately estimate the amplitude of interference EMG is likely the result of unavoidable amplitude cancellation. Biomed Sign Proc and Control. 2008;3(2):154–162
  107. Klass M, Baudry S, Duchateau J. Voluntary activation during maximal contraction with advancing age: a brief review. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007;100(5):543–551
  108. Kleissen RFM, Buurke JH, Harlaar J, Zilvold G. Electromyography in the biomechanical analysis of human movement and its clinical application. Gait Posture. 1998;8(2):143–158
  109. Knight CA, Kamen G. Superficial motor units are larger than deeper motor units in human vastus lateralis muscle. Muscle Nerve. 2005;31(4):475–480
  110. Komi PV, Buskirk ER. Reproducibility of electromyographic measurements with inserted wire electrodes and surface electrodes. Electromyography. 1970;10(4):357–367
  111. Korner L, Parker P, Almstrom C, Andersson GB, Herberts P, Kadefors R, et al. Relation of intramuscular pressure to the force output and myoelectric signal of skeletal muscle. J Orthop Res. 1984;2(3):289–296
  112. Kugelberg E. The motor unit: anatomy and histochemical functional correlations. Riv Patol Nerv Ment. 1976;97(5):251–258
  113. Laursen B, Jensen BR, Nemeth G, Sjogaard G. A model predicting individual shoulder muscle forces based on relationship between electromyographic and 3D external forces in static position. J Biomech. 1998;31(8):731–739
  114. Lawrence JH, De Luca CJ. Myoelectric signal versus force relationship in different human muscles. J Appl Physiol. 1983;54(6):1653–1659
  115. Libkind MS. Modelling of interference bioelectric activity. Biofizika. 1968;13(4):685–693
  116. Liddell E, Sherrington C. Recruitment and some other factors of reflex inhibition. Proc Roy Soc London B. 1925;97:488–518
  117. Lieber RL, Friden J. Functional and clinical significance of skeletal muscle architecture. Muscle Nerve. 2000;23(11):1647–1666
  118. Lind AR, Petrofsky JS. Amplitude of the surface electromyogram during fatiguing isometric contractions. Muscle Nerve. 1979;2(4):257–264
  119. Lindstrom L, Magnusson R. Interpretation of myoelectric power spectra: a model and its applications. Proc IEEE. 1977;65:653–662
  120. Lippold OC. The relation between integrated action potentials in a human muscle and its isometric tension. J Physiol. 1952;117(4):492–499
  121. Liu MM, Herzog W, Savelberg HH. Dynamic muscle force predictions from EMG: an artificial neural network approach. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1999;9(6):391–400
  122. Lloyd DG, Besier TF. An EMG-driven musculoskeletal model to estimate muscle forces and knee joint moments in vivo. J Biomech. 2003;36(6):765–776
  123. Lucas K. The “all-or-none” contraction of the amphibian skeletal muscle fibre. J Physiol. 1909;38(2–3):113–133
  124. MacDonald DA, Moseley GL, Hodges PW. The lumbar multifidus: does the evidence support clinical beliefs?. Man Ther. 2006;11(4):254–263
  125. Madeleine P, Bajaj P, Sogaard K, Arendt-Nielsen L. Mechanomyography and electromyography force relationships during concentric, isometric and eccentric contractions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2001;11(2):113–121
  126. Madeleine P, Tuker K, Arendt-Nielsen L, Farina D. Heterogeneous mechanomyographic absolute activation of paraspinal muscles assessed by a two-dimensional array during short and sustained contractions. J Biomech. 2007;40(12):2663–2671
  127. Mademli L, Arampatzis A, Morey-Klapsing G, Bruggemann GP. Effect of ankle joint position and electrode placement on the estimation of the antagonistic moment during maximal plantarflexion. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004;14(5):591–597
  128. Maganaris CN, Baltzopoulos V. Predictability of in vivo changes in pennation angle of human tibialis anterior muscle from rest to maximum isometric dorsiflexion. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1999;79(3):294–297
  129. Marras WS, Jorgensen MJ, Granata KP, Wiand B. Female and male trunk geometry: size and prediction of the spine loading trunk muscles derived from MRI. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2001;16(1):38–46
  130. Marras WS, Davis KG. A non-MVC EMG normalization technique for the trunk musculature: Part 1. Method development. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2001;11(1):1–9
  131. Masuda T, Miyano H, Sadoyama T. The propagation of motor unit action potential and the location of neuromuscular junction investigated by surface electrode arrays. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1983;55(5):594–600
  132. Masuda T, Sadoyama T. Skeletal muscles from which the propagation of motor unit action potentials is detectable with a surface electrode array. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1987;67(5):421–427
  133. Masuda T, Sadoyama T. Topographical map of innervation zones within single motor units measured with a grid surface electrode. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1988;35(8):623–628
  134. Mathiassen SE, Winkel J, Haegg GM. Normalization of surface EMG amplitude from the upper trapezius muscle in ergonomic studies. A review. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1995;5(4):197–226
  135. Matthews PB. Relationship of firing intervals of human motor units to the trajectory of post-spike after-hyperpolarization and synaptic noise. J Physiol. 1996;492(Pt 2):597–628
  136. McGill KC. Surface electromyogram signal modelling. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2004;42(4):446–454
  137. McGill SM, Norman RW. Partitioning of the L4–L5 dynamic moment into disc, ligamentous, and muscular components during lifting. Spine. 1986;11(7):666–678
  138. Merletti R, Farina D, Gazzoni M. The linear electrode array: a useful tool with many applications. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003;13(1):37–47
  139. Merletti R, Farina D, Gazzoni M, Merlo A, Osso P, Rainoldi A. Surface electromyography: a window on the muscle, a glimpse on the central nervous system. Eur Med Phys. 2001;37:57–68
  140. Merletti R, Knaflitz M, De Luca CJ. Myoelectric manifestations of fatigue in voluntary and electrically elicited contractions. J Appl Physiol. 1990;69(5):1810–1820
  141. Merletti R, Lo Conte L, Avignone E, Guglielminotti P. Modeling of surface myoelectric signals–Part I: model implementation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1999;46(7):810–820
  142. Merletti R, Rainoldi A, Farina D. Surface electromyography for noninvasive characterization of muscle. Exer Sport Sci Rev. 2001;29(1):20–25
  143. Metting van Rijn AC, Peper A, Grimbergen CA. High-quality recording of bioelectric events Part 1. Interference reduction, theory and practice. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1990;28(5):389–397
  144. Milner-Brown HS, Stein RB. The relation between the surface electromyogram and muscular force. J Physiol. 1975;246(3):549–569
  145. Moore AD. Synthesized EMG waves and their implications. Am J Phys Med. 1967;46(3):1302–1316
  146. Moritani T, deVries HA. Reexamination of the relationship between the surface integrated electromyogram (IEMG) and force of isometric contraction. Am J Phys Med. 1978;57(6):263–277
  147. Moseley GL, Hodges PW, Gandevia SC. External perturbation of the trunk in standing humans differentially activates components of the medial back muscles. J Physiol. 2003;547(Pt 2):581–587
  148. Moseley GL, Hodges PW, Gandevia SC. Deep and superficial fibers of the lumbar multifidus muscle are differentially active during voluntary arm movements. Spine. 2002;27(2):29–36
  149. Muraoka T, Muramatsu T, Fukunaga T, Kanehisa H. Influence of tendon slack on electromechanical delay in the human medial gastrocnemius in vivo. J Appl Physiol. 2004;96(2):540–544
  150. Nandedkar SD, Sigl JC, Kim YI, Stalberg EV. Radial decline of the extracellular action potential. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1984;22(6):564–568
  151. Nishimura S, Tomita Y, Horiuchi T. Clinical application of an active electrode using an operational amplifier. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1992;39(10):1096–1099
  152. Norman RW, Komi PV. Electromechanical delay in skeletal muscle under normal movement conditions. Acta Physiol Scand. 1979;106(3):241–248
  153. Nussbaum MA, Chaffin DB. Lumbar muscle force estimation using a subject-invariant 5-parameter EMG-based model. J Biomech. 1998;31(7):667–672
  154. Olivier K, Portero P, Maisetti O, Hogrel JY. Repeatability of surface EMG parameters at various isometric contraction levels and during fatigue using bipolar and Laplacian electrode configurations. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2005;15(5):466–473
  155. Olney SJ, Winter DA. Predictions of knee and ankle moments of force in walking from EMG and kinematic data. J Biomech. 1985;18(1):9–20
  156. Parker P, Englehart KB, Hudgins B. Myoelectric signal processing for control of powered limb prostheses. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2006;16(6):541–548
  157. Paton ME, Brown JMM. An electromyographic analysis of functional –differentiation in human pectoralis major muscle. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1994;4(3):161–169
  158. Person RS, Libkind MS. Simulation of electromyograms showing interference patterns. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1970;28(6):625–632
  159. Piazza SJ, Delp SL. The influence of muscles on knee flexion during the swing phase of gait. J Biomech. 1996;29(6):723–733
  160. Plonsey R. The active fiber in a volume conductor. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1974;21(5):371–381
  161. Potvin JR, Brown SH. Less is more: high pass filtering, to remove up to 99% of the surface EMG signal power, improves EMG-based biceps brachii muscle force estimates. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004;14(3):389–399
  162. Potvin JR, Norman RW, McGill SM. Mechanically corrected EMG for the continuous estimation of erector spinae muscle loading during repetitive lifting. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1996;74(1–2):119–132
  163. Redfern MS, Hughes RE, Chaffin DB. High-pass filtering to remove electrocardiographic interference from torso EMG recordings. Clin Biomech. 1993;8(1):44–48
  164. Reucher H, Rau G, Silny J. Spatial filtering of noninvasive multielectrode EMG: Part I – introduction to measuring technique and applications. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1987;34(4):98–105.
  165. Ridderikhoff A, Peper CL, Carson RG, Beek PJ. Effector dynamics of rhythmic wrist activity and its implications for (modeling) bimanual coordination. Hum Mov Sci. 2004;23(3–4):285–313
  166. Riley ZA, Terry ME, Mendez-Villanueva A, Litsey JC, Enoka RM. Motor unit recruitment and bursts of activity in the surface electromyogram during a sustained contraction. Muscle Nerve. 2008;37(6):745–753
  167. Roeleveld K. Surface motor unit potentials: the building stones of surface electromyography. PhD thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen; 1997.
  168. Roeleveld K, Blok JH, Stegeman DF, van Oosterom A. Volume conduction models for surface EMG; confrontation with measurements. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1997;7(4):221–232
  169. Roeleveld K, Stegeman DF, Vingerhoets HM, Van Oosterom A. Motor unit potential contribution to surface electromyography. Acta Physiol Scand. 1997;160(2):175–183
  170. Roeleveld K, Stegeman DF, Vingerhoets HM, Zwarts MJ. How inter-electrode distance and motor unit depth influence surface potentials. SENIAM. 1997;5:55–59
  171. Roeleveld K, van Engelen BG, Stegeman DF. Possible mechanisms of muscle cramp from temporal and spatial surface EMG characteristics. J Appl Physiol. 2000;88(5):1698–1706
  172. Rosenfalck P. Intra- and extracellular potential fields of active nerve and muscle fibres. A physico-mathematical analysis of different models. Thromb Diath Haemorrh Suppl. 1969;321:1–168
  173. Saitou K, Masuda T, Michikami D, Koijma R, Okada M. Innervation zones of the upper and lower limb muscles estimated by using multichannel surface EMG. J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 2000;29(1–2):35–52
  174. Scholle HC, Schumann NP, Biedermann F, Stegeman DF, Grassme R, Roeleveld K, et al. Spatiotemporal surface EMG characteristics from rat triceps brachii muscle during treadmill locomotion indicate selective recruitment of functionally distinct muscle regions. Exp Brain Res. 2001;138(1):26–36
  175. Schulte E, Kallenberg LA, Christensen H, Disselhorst-Klug C, Hermens HJ, Rau G, et al. Comparison of the electromyographic activity in the upper trapezius and biceps brachii muscle in subjects with muscular disorders: a pilot study. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;96(2):185–193
  176. Sherrington C. Remarks on some aspects of reflex inhibition. Proc Roy Soc London B. 1925;97:19–45
  177. Sirca A, Kostevc V. The fibre type composition of thoracic and lumbar paravertebral muscles in man. J Anat. 1985;141:131–137
  178. Sjogaard G, Sogaard K, Hermens HJ, Sandsjo L, Laubli T, Thorn S, et al. Neuromuscular assessment in elderly workers with and without work related shoulder/neck trouble: the NEW-study design and physiological findings. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;96(2):110–121
  179. Soechting JF, Flanders M. Evaluating an integrated musculoskeletal model of the human arm. J Biomech Eng. 1997;119(1):93–102
  180. Sogaard K, Sjogaard G, Finsen L, Olsen HB, Christensen H. Motor unit activity during stereotyped finger tasks and computer mouse work. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2001;11(3):197–206
  181. Solomonow M, Baratta R, Shoji H, D’Ambrosia RD. The myoelectric signal of electrically stimulated muscle during recruitment: an inherent feedback parameter for a closed-loop control scheme. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1986;33(8):735–745
  182. Solomonow M, Baratta R, Zhou BH, Shoji H, D’Ambrosia RD. The EMG-force model of electrically stimulated muscles: dependence on control strategy and predominant fiber composition. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1987;34(9):692–703
  183. Solomonow M, Guzzi A, Baratta R, Shoji H, D’Ambrosia R. EMG-force model of the elbows antagonistic muscle pair. The effect of joint position, gravity and recruitment. Am J Phys Med. 1986;65(5):223–244
  184. Staudenmann D, Daffertshofer A, Kingma I, Stegeman DF, Van Dieen JH. Independent component analysis of high-density electromyography in muscle force estimation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007;54(4):751–754
  185. Staudenmann D, Kingma I, Daffertshofer A, Stegeman DF, van Dieen JH. Improving EMG-based muscle force estimation by using a high-density EMG grid and principal component analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006;53(4):712–719
  186. Staudenmann D, Kingma I, Daffertshofer A, Stegeman DF, van Dieen JH. Heterogeneity of muscle activation in relation to force direction. A multi-channel surface electromyography study on the triceps surae muscle. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009;19:882–895
  187. Staudenmann D, Kingma I, Stegeman DF, van Dieen JH. Towards optimal multi-channel EMG electrode configurations in muscle force estimation: a high density EMG study. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2005;15(1):1–11
  188. Staudenmann D, Potvin JR, Kingma I, Stegeman DF, van Dieen JH. Effects of EMG processing on biomechanical models of muscle joint systems: Sensitivity of trunk muscle moments, spinal forces, and stability. J Biomech. 2007;40(4):900–909
  189. Stegeman DF, Dumitru D, King JC, Roeleveld K. Near- and far-fields: source characteristics and the conducting medium in neurophysiology. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;14(5):429–442
  190. Stephenson DG, Wendt IR. Length dependence of changes in sarcoplasmic calcium concentration and myofibrillar calcium sensitivity in striated muscle fibres. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1984;5(3):243–272
  191. Stokes IA. Relationships of EMG to effort in the trunk under isometric conditions: force-increasing and decreasing effects and temporal delays. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005;20(1):9–15
  192. Taelman J, Van Huffel S, Spaepen A. Wavelet-Independent Component Analysis to remove Electrocardiography Contamination in surface Electromyography. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;1:682–685
  193. Theeuwen M, Gielen CC, Miller LE, Doorenbosch C. The relation between the direction dependence of electromyographic amplitude and motor unit recruitment thresholds during isometric contractions. Exp Brain Res. 1994;98(3):488–500
  194. Thelen DG, Schultz AB, Fassois SD, Ashton-Miller JA. Identification of dynamic myoelectric signal-to-force models during isometric lumbar muscle contractions. J Biomech. 1994;27(7):907–919
  195. Thornell LE, Price MG. The cytoskeleton in muscle cells in relation to function. Biochem Soc Trans. 1991;19(4):1116–1120
  196. Trotter JA, Richmond FJ, Purslow PP. Functional morphology and motor control of series-fibered muscles. Exer Sport Sci Rev. 1995;23:167–213
  197. Turkawski SJ, van Eijden TM. Mechanical properties of single motor units in the rabbit masseter muscle as a function of jaw position. Exp Brain Res. 2001;138(2):153–162
  198. Turker KS, Miles TS. Cross-talk from other muscles can contaminate EMG signals in reflex studies of the human leg. Neurosci Lett. 1990;111(1-2):164–169
  199. Van Cutsem M, Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Changes in single motor unit behaviour contribute to the increase in contraction speed after dynamic training in humans. J Physiol. 1998;513(1):295–305
  200. van der Helm FC, Veenbaas R. Modelling the mechanical effect of muscles with large attachment sites: application to the shoulder mechanism. J Biomech. 1991;24(12):1151–1163
  201. van Dieen JH, Cholewicki J, Radebold A. Trunk muscle recruitment patterns in patients with low back pain enhance the stability of the lumbar spine. Spine. 2003;28(8):834–841
  202. van Dieen JH, Kingma I. Total trunk muscle force and spinal compression are lower in asymmetric moments as compared to pure extension moments. J Biomech. 1999;32(7):681–687
  203. van Dieen JH, Kingma I, van der Bug P. Evidence for a role of antagonistic cocontraction in controlling trunk stiffness during lifting. J Biomech. 2003;36(12):1829–1836
  204. van Dieen JH, Kingma I. Effects of antagonistic co-contraction on differences between electromyography based and optimization based estimates of spinal forces. Ergonomics. 2005;48:411–426
  205. van Dieen JH, Ogita F, de Haan A. Reduced neural drive in bilateral exertions: A performance-limiting factor?. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:111–118
  206. van Dieen JH, Thissen CE, van de Ven AJ, Toussaint HM. The electro-mechanical delay of the erector spinae muscle: influence of rate of force development, fatigue and electrode location. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1991;63(3-4):216–222
  207. Van Dijk JP, Lowery MM, Lapatki BG, Stegeman DF. Evidence of potential averaging over the finite surface of a bioelectric surface electrode. Ann Biomed Eng. 2009;37(6):1141–1151
  208. van Vugt JP, van Dijk JG. A convenient method to reduce crosstalk in surface EMG. Cobb award-winning article, 2001. Clin Neurophysiol 2001;112(4):583–92.
  209. Viitasalo JJ, Komi PV. Signal characteristics of EMG with special reference to reproducibility of measurements. Acta Physiol Scand. 1975;93(4):531–539
  210. Vink P, van der Velde EA, Verbout AJ. A functional subdivision of the lumbar extensor musculature. Recruitment patterns and force-RA-EMG relationships under isometric conditions. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1987;27(8):517–525
  211. Vos EJ, Harlaar J, van Ingen Schenau GJ. Electromechanical delay during knee extensor contractions. Med Sci Sports Exer. 1991;23(10):1187–1193
  212. Webster JG. Reducing motion artifacts and interference in biopotential recording. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1984;31(12):823–826
  213. Welter TG, Bobbert MF. During slow wrist movements, distance covered affects EMG at a given external force. Motor Control. 2001;5(1):50–60
  214. Welter TG, Bobbert MF, van Bollhuis BM, Gielen SC, Rozendaal LA, Veeger DH. Relevance of the force–velocity relationship in the activation of mono- and Bi-articular muscles in slow arm movements in humans. Motor Control. 2000;4(4):420–438
  215. White SC, Winter DA. Predicting muscle forces in gait from EMG signals and musculotendon kinematics. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1992;2(4):217–231
  216. Wickham JB, Brown JM. Muscles within muscles: the neuromotor control of intra-muscular segments. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998;78(3):219–225
  217. Windhorst U, Hamm TH, Stuart DG. On the function of muscle and reflex partitioning. Beh Brain Sci. 1989;12(4):629–681
  218. Winter DA, Fuglevand AJ, Archer SE. Crosstalk in surface electromyography: theoretical and practical estimates. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1994;4(1):15–26
  219. Winters JM. Hill-based muscle models: a systems engineering approach; 1990.
  220. Woittiez RD, Huijing PA, Boom HB, Rozendal RH. A three-dimensional muscle model: a quantified relation between form and function of skeletal muscles. J Morphol. 1984;182(1):95–113
  221. Wolf SL, Ammerman J, Jann B. Organization of responses in human lateral gastrocnemius muscle to specified body perturbations. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1998;8(1):11–21
  222. Woods JJ, Bigland-Ritchie B. Linear and non-linear surface EMG/force relationships in human muscles. An anatomical/functional argument for the existence of both. Am J Phys Med. 1983;62(6):287–299
  223. Yang JF, Winter DA. Electromyography reliability in maximal and submaximal isometric contractions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983;64(9):417–420
  224. Yao W, Fuglevand RJ, Enoka RM. Motor-unit synchronization increases EMG amplitude and decreases force steadiness of simulated contractions. J Neurophysiol. 2000;83(1):441–452
  225. Zecca M, Micera S, Carrozza MC, Dario P. Control of multifunctional prosthetic hands by processing the electromyographic signal. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2002;30(4–6):459–485
  226. Zhou P, Rymer WZ. Factors governing the form of the relation between muscle force and the EMG: a simulation study. J Neurophysiol. 2004;92(5):2878–2886
  227. Zuniga EN, Simons EG. Nonlinear relationship between averaged electromyogram potential and muscle tension in normal subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1969;50(11):613–620

PII: S1050-6411(09)00122-9

doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2009.08.005

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 20, Issue 3 , Pages 375-387 , June 2010

Article Tools