Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 20, Issue 3 , Pages 413-419, June 2010

Reciprocal influences on performances of a postural–suprapostural task by manipulating the level of task-load

  • Cheng-Ya Huang

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Allied Health Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Rong-Ju Cherng

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Allied Health Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
    • Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Ing-Shiou Hwang

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Allied Health Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
    • Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan. Tel.: +886 6 2353535x5932; fax: +886 6 2370411.

Received 20 March 2009; received in revised form 19 May 2009; accepted 9 June 2009. published online 28 August 2009.

Abstract 

The objective of this study was to investigate the reciprocal influences of stance pattern (bilateral stance vs. unilateral stance) and thumb-index precision grip task (static target vs. dynamic target) on postural–suprapostural tasks by manipulating task-load. Fifteen healthy volunteers participated in four postural–suprapostural tasks, including static force-matching in bilateral/unilateral stance (BS_static; US_static), dynamic force-matching in bilateral/unilateral stance (BS_dynamic; US_dynamic), and two control tasks in bilateral and unilateral stances without a finger task. The normalized force error (NFE), reaction time (RT) of the finger tasks, and normalized change in center of pressure sway (ΔNCoP) were measured. For suprapostural task performance, a significant interaction effect between postural and suprapostural tasks on NFE of the finger tasks was noted (static: BS<US; dynamic: BS>US), but RT was not different among the four tasks. For postural task performance, negative ΔNCoP during unilateral stance indicated a spontaneous reduction in postural sway due to added force-matching. In contrast, addition of force-matching tended to increase postural sway during bilateral stance, but postural fluctuations decreased as task-load of suprapostural task increased (BS_dynamic<BS_static). In conclusion, performance of postural–suprapostural tasks was differently modulated by task-load increment. Our observations favored adaptive resource-sharing and implicit expansion of resource capacity for a postural task with a motor suprapostural goal.

Keywords: Grip precision, Postural sway, Dual task, Reaction time

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1050-6411(09)00091-1

doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2009.06.003

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 20, Issue 3 , Pages 413-419, June 2010