Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 20, Issue 2 , Pages 212-222, April 2010

Quantifying ‘normal’ shoulder muscle activity during abduction

  • James Wickham

      Affiliations

    • School of Human Biosciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Victoria 3086, Australia
    • Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Victoria 3086, Australia
    • School of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: School of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia. Tel.: +61 2 63657586; fax: 61 2 63657563.
  • ,
  • Tania Pizzari

      Affiliations

    • School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Victoria 3086, Australia
    • Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Victoria 3086, Australia
  • ,
  • Katie Stansfeld

      Affiliations

    • School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Victoria 3086, Australia
  • ,
  • Amanda Burnside

      Affiliations

    • School of Human Biosciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Victoria 3086, Australia
  • ,
  • Lyn Watson

      Affiliations

    • LifeCare Prahran Sports Medicine, 316 Malvern Road, Prahran, Victoria 3181, Australia

Received 4 February 2009; received in revised form 20 April 2009; accepted 1 June 2009. published online 22 July 2009.

Abstract 

The purpose of this experiment was to obtain electromyographic (EMG) activity from a sample of healthy shoulders to allow a reference database to be developed and used for comparison with pathological shoulders. Temporal and intensity shoulder muscle activation characteristics during a coronal plane abduction/adduction movement were evaluated in the dominant healthy shoulder of 24 subjects. Surface and intramuscular fine wire electrodes recorded EMG activity from 15 shoulder muscles (deltoid×3, trapezius×3, subscapularis×2, latissimus dorsi, pectoralis major, pectoralis minor, supraspinatus, infraspinatus, serratus anterior and rhomboids) at 2000Hz for 10s whilst each subject performed 10 dynamic coronal plane abduction/adduction movements from 0° to 166° to 0° with a light dumbbell. Results revealed that supraspinatus (−.102s before movement onset) initiated the movement with middle trapezius (−.019s) and middle deltoid (−.014s) also activated before the movement onset. Similar patterns were also found in the time of peak amplitude and %MVC with a pattern emerging where the prime movers (supraspinatus and middle deltoid) were among the first to reach peak amplitude or display the highest %MVC values. In conclusion, the most reproducible patterns of activation arose from the more prime mover muscle sites in all EMG variables analysed and although variability was present, there emerged ‘invariant characteristics’ that were considered ‘normal’ for this group of non pathological shoulders. The authors believe that the methodology and certain parts of the analysis in this study can be duplicated and used by future researchers who require a reference database of muscle activity for use as a control group in comparisons to their respective pathological shoulder group.

Keywords: Electromyography, Shoulder, Abduction, Muscle, Normal

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1050-6411(09)00087-X

doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2009.06.004

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 20, Issue 2 , Pages 212-222, April 2010