Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 19, Issue 6 , Pages e422-e429, December 2009

A submaximal test to assess back muscle capacity: Evaluation of construct validity

  • Christian Larivière

      Affiliations

    • Occupational Health and Safety Research Institute Robert-Sauvé, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 3C2
    • Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal Rehabilitation Institute, 6300 Darlington, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3S 2J4
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST), 505, boul. De Maisonneuve Ouest, Montréal (Québec), Canada H3A 3C2. Tel.: +1 514 288 1551x217; fax: +1 514 288 6097.
  • ,
  • Denis Gravel

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal Rehabilitation Institute, 6300 Darlington, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3S 2J4
    • School of Rehabilitation, University of Montreal, C.P. 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3C 3J7
  • ,
  • Phillip Gardiner

      Affiliations

    • HLHP Research Institute, University of Manitoba, Canada
  • ,
  • A. Bertrand Arsenault

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal Rehabilitation Institute, 6300 Darlington, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3S 2J4
    • School of Rehabilitation, University of Montreal, C.P. 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3C 3J7
  • ,
  • Denis Gagnon

      Affiliations

    • Department of Kinanthropology, University of Sherbrooke, 2500 Boul. Université, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada J1K 2R1
  • ,
  • Patrick Loisel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Received 3 July 2008; received in revised form 26 November 2008; accepted 26 November 2008. published online 05 January 2009.

Abstract 

A functional endurance test more specific to common occupational tasks is proposed for assessing back muscle capacity. The test involves static intermittent contractions (8-s work-rest cycles) using a predefined absolute load (90 Nm) across subjects. Since the test involved an absolute endurance task, it was hypothesized that performance would be influenced by both the strength and relative endurance of the subjects, thus demonstrating the construct validity of this new test. Fifteen males and 17 females were assessed on three different days to allow familiarization and to measure their Strength as well as their absolute and relative endurance. Absolute and relative endurance were defined as the time to reach exhaustion (Tendabs and Tendrel, respectively) during a fatigue protocol including both an absolute (90 Nm) and a relative (40% of individual strength) load (extension moment at the L5/S1 joint). Strength and Tendrel each explained an almost equivalent portion of Tendabs (total variance explained: 61.5%), thus confirming the construct validity of the functional endurance test. This new test should better identify the back muscle impairments (weakness, fatigability) often observed in chronic low-back-pain patients.

Keywords: Back muscles, Strength, Relative endurance, Rehabilitation, Absolute endurance

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1050-6411(08)00200-9

doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.11.009

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 19, Issue 6 , Pages e422-e429, December 2009