Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 19, Issue 1 , Pages 22-29 , February 2009

Motor unit discharge pattern and conduction velocity in patients with upper motor neuron syndrome

  • Isabella Campanini

      Affiliations

    • LAM Laboratorio Analisi Movimento (Dip. Riabilitazione) AUSL di Reggio Emilia, Correggio, Italy
    • ,
  • Andrea Merlo

      Affiliations

    • LAM Laboratorio Analisi Movimento (Dip. Riabilitazione) AUSL di Reggio Emilia, Correggio, Italy
    • ,
  • Dario Farina

      Affiliations

    • Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction (SMI), Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7 D-3, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +45 96358821; fax: +45 98154008.

Received 17 May 2007 ,Revised 29 June 2007 ,Accepted 29 June 2007.

References 

  1. Abbruzzese G. The medical management of spasticity. Eur J Neurol. 2002;Suppl 1:30–34
  2. Chung SG, Van Rey E, Bai Z, Roth EJ, Zhang LQ. Biomechanic changes in passive properties of hemiplegic ankles with spastic hypertonia. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2004;85:1638–1646
  3. Delp SL. What causes increased muscle stiffness in cerebral palsy?. Muscle Nerve. 2003;27:131–132
  4. Dietz V, Ketelsen UP, Berger W, Quintern J. Motor unit involvement in spastic paresis. Relationship between leg muscle activation and histochemistry. J Neurol Sci. 1986;75:89–103
  5. Farina D, Muhammad W, Fortunato E, Meste O, Merletti R, Rix H. Estimation of single motor unit conduction velocity from surface electromyogram signals detected with linear electrode arrays. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2001;39:225–236
  6. Farina D, Arendt-Nielsen L, Merletti R, Graven-Nielsen T. Assessment of single motor unit conduction velocity during sustained contractions of the tibialis anterior muscle with advanced spike triggered averaging. J Neurosci Meth. 2002;30:1–12
  7. Farina D, Gazzoni M, Camelia F. Low-threshold motor unit membrane properties vary with contraction intensity during sustained activation with surface EMG visual feedback. J Appl Physiol. 2004;96:1505–1515
  8. Frontera WR, Grimby L, Larsson L. Firing rate of the lower motoneuron and contractile properties of its muscle fibers after upper motoneuron lesion in man. Muscle Nerve. 1997;20:938–947
  9. Gazzoni M, Farina D, Merletti R. A new method for the extraction and classification of single motor unit action potentials from surface EMG signals. J Neurosci Meth. 2004;136:165–177
  10. Gemperline JJ, Allen S, Walk D, Rymer WZ. Characteristics of motor unit discharge in subjects with hemiparesis. Muscle Nerve. 1995;18:1101–1114
  11. Gracies JM. Pathophysiology of spastic paresis. I: paresis and soft tissue changes. Muscle Nerve. 2005;31:535–551
  12. Gracies JM. Pathophysiology of spastic paresis. II: emergence of muscle overactivity. Muscle Nerve. 2005;31:552–571
  13. Heckman CJ, Enoka RM. Physiology of the motor neuron and the motor unit. In:  Eisen A editors. Clinical neurophysiology of motor neuron diseases. Vancouver Canada: Elsevier; 2004;p. 119–147
  14. Henneman E. Relation between size of neurons and their susceptibility to discharge. Science. 1957;126:1345–1347
  15. Ivanhoe CB, Reistetter TA. Spasticity: the misunderstood part of the upper motor neuron syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehab. 2004;83:S3–S9
  16. Mayer NH. Clinicophysiologic concepts of spasticity and motor dysfunction in adults with an upper motoneuron lesion. Muscle Nerve. 1997;Suppl 6:S1–S13
  17. Merletti R, Farina D, Gazzoni M, Schieroni MP. Effect of age on muscle functions investigated with surface electromyography. Muscle Nerve. 2002;25:65–76
  18. Merletti R, Farina D, Gazzoni M. The linear electrode array: a useful tool with many applications. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003;13:37–47
  19. Morimoto S, Masuda M. Dependence of conduction velocity on spike interval during voluntary muscular contraction in human motor units. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1984;53:191–195
  20. Nandedkar SD, Sanders DB, Stalberg EV. Automatic analysis of the electromyographic interference pattern. Part I: development of quantitative features. Muscle Nerve. 1986;9:431–439
  21. Nishizono H, Kurata H, Miyashita M. Muscle fiber conduction velocity related to stimulation rate. Electroen Clin Neurophysiol. 1989;72:529–534
  22. Nordstrom MA, Fuglevand AJ, Enoka RM. Estimating the strength of common input to human motoneurons from the cross-correlogram. J Physiol. 1992;453:547–574
  23. Person RS, Kudina LP. Discharge frequency and discharge pattern of human motor units during voluntary contraction of muscle. Electroen Clin Neurophysiol. 1972;32:471–483
  24. Plonsey R, Barr RC. Bioelectricity: a quantitative approach. Plenum Press; 2000;
  25. Stalberg E. Propagation velocity in human muscle fibers in situ. Acta Physiol Scand. 1966;Suppl 287:1–112
  26. Sun TY, Chen JJ, Lin TS. Analysis of motor unit firing patterns in patients with central or peripheral lesions using singular-value decomposition. Muscle Nerve. 2000;23:1057–1068
  27. Troni W, Cantello R, Rainero I. Conduction velocity along human muscle fibers in situ. Neurology. 1983;33:1453–1459
  28. Young JL, Mayer RF. Physiological alterations of motor units in hemiplegia. J Neurol Sci. 1982;54:401–412

PII: S1050-6411(07)00114-9

doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.06.018

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 19, Issue 1 , Pages 22-29 , February 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution