Interaction of viscoelastic tissue compliance with lumbar muscles during passive cyclic flexion–extension
Received 7 December 2006; received in revised form 14 May 2007; accepted 16 June 2007. published online 20 August 2007.
Abstract
Human and animal models using electromyography (EMG) based methods have hypothesized that viscoelastic tissue properties becomes compromised by prolonged repetitive cyclic trunk flexion–extension which in turn influences muscular activation including the flexion–relaxation phenomenon. Empirical evidence to support this hypothesis, especially the development of viscoelastic tension–relaxation and its associated muscular response in passive cyclic activity in humans, is incomplete. The objective of this study was to examine the response of lumbar muscles to tension–relaxation development of the viscoelastic tissue during prolonged passive cyclic trunk flexion–extension. Activity of the lumbar muscles remained low and steady during the passive exercise session. Tension supplied by the posterior viscoelastic tissues decreased over time without corresponding changes in muscular activity. Active flexion, following the passive flexion session, elicited significant increase in paraspinal muscles EMG together with increase in the median frequency. It was concluded that reduction of tension in the lumbar viscoelastic tissues of humans occurs during cyclic flexion–extension and is compensated by increased activity of the musculature in order to maintain stability. It was also concluded that the ligamento-muscular reflex is inhibited during passive activities but becomes hyperactive following active cyclic flexion, indicating that moment requirements are the controlling variable. It is conceived that prolonged routine exposure to cyclic flexion minimizes the function of the viscoelastic tissues and places increasing demands on the neuromuscular system which over time may lead to a disorder and possible exposure to injury.
aDepartment of Kinesiology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, USA
bDepartment of Kinesiology, Louisiana State University, 112 Long Field House, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
cBioengineering Division, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO, USA
dOccupational Medicine Research Center, Louisiana State University, Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, USA
Corresponding author. Address: Department of Kinesiology, Louisiana State University, 112 Long Field House, Baton Rouge, LA, USA. Tel.: +1 225 578 9146; fax: +1 225 578 3680.