Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 16, Issue 6 , Pages 541-548 , December 2006

Myoelectric signal processing for control of powered limb prostheses

References 

  1. Almstrom C, Herberts P, Korner L. Experience with Swedish multifunction prosthetic hands controlled by pattern recognition of multiple myoelectric signals. Int Orthop. 1981;5:15–21
  2. Battye CK, Nightengale A, Whillis J. The use of myo-electric current in the operation of prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg B. 1955;37:506–510
  3. Berger N, Huppert CR. The use of electrical and mechanical forces for control of an electric prosthesis. Am J Occup Ther. 1952;6:110–114
  4. Bottomley AH. Myoelectric control of powered prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg B. 1965;47:411–415
  5. Chan A, Englehart K. Continuous control of powered prostheses using hidden Markov models. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2005;52(1):121–124
  6. Childress DS. A myoelectric three-state controller using rate sensitivity. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACEMB conference. Chicago; 1969. p. 4–5.
  7. Davidge K, Englehart K, Parker P. In: Proceedings of the XVth ISEK conference. Boston; 2004. p. 59.
  8. Doershuk PC, Gustafson DE, Willsky AS. Upper extremity limb function discrimination using EMG signal analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1983;30(1):18–28
  9. Dorcas DS, Scott RN. A three-state myoelectric controller. Med Biol Eng. 1966;4:367–370
  10. Englehart K, Hudgins B. A robust real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2003;50(7):848–854
  11. Englehart K, Hudgins B, Parker P, Stevenson M. Classification of the myoelectric signal using time-frequency based representations. Med Eng Phys. 1999;21:431–438
  12. Englehart K, Hudgins B, Parker P. Multifunction control of powered prostheses using the myoelectric signal. In: Teodorescu , Jain  editor. Intelligent technologies for rehabilitation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2001;p. 1–61
  13. Englehart K, Hudgins B, Parker PA. A wavelet based continuous classification scheme for multifunction myoelectric control. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2001;48(3):302–311
  14. Finley R, Wirta R. Myocoder studies of multiple myocoder response. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1967;48:598
  15. Graupe D, Cline W. Functional separation of EMG signal via ARMA identification methods for prosthetic control purposes. IEEE Trans Systems Man Cybernet. 1975;5(2):252–259
  16. Herberts P. Myoelectric signals in control of prostheses. Acta Orthop Scand. 1969;40(Suppl. 124):83
  17. Hogan N, Mann R. Myoelectric signal processing: optimal estimation applied to electromyography-Part 1: derivation of the optimal myoprocessor. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1980;27:382–395
  18. Hudgins BS, Parker PA, Scott R. A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1993;40(1):82–94
  19. Hudgins BS, Parker PA, Scott RN. A pattern recognition approach to multifunction myoelectric control. Med Life Sci Eng. 1994;13:21–38
  20. Hudgins B, Englehart K, Parker PA, Scott RN. A microprocessor-based multifunction myoelectric control system. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Canadian medical and biological engineering society conference. Toronto; 1997. p. 138–9.
  21. Jacobsen SC, Mann RW. Control systems for artificial arms. In: IEEE conference on systems, man and cybernetics. Boston; 1973. p. 5–7.
  22. Kato I, Okazaki E, Nakamura H. The electrically controlled hand prosthesis using command disc or EMG. J Soc Inst Control Eng. 1967;6:236
  23. Kobrinski AY. Bioelectric control of prosthetic devices. Herald USSR Acad Sci. 1960;30(7):58–61
  24. Kuruganti U, Hudgins B, Scott RN. Two-channel enhancement of a multifunction control scheme. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1995;4(1):109–111
  25. Lock B, Englehart K, Hudgins B. Real-time myoelectric control in a virtual environment to relate usability vs. accuracy. In: Proceedings of MEC’05 conference 2005; UNB. p. 122–6.
  26. Lyman J, Freedy A, Prior R. Fundamentals and applied research related to the design and development of upper-limb externally powered prostheses. Bull Prosthet Res. 1976;13:184–195
  27. In:  Mazumdar A editors. Powered upper limb prostheses. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2004;
  28. Miller L, Lipschutz R, Stubblefield K, Kuiken T. Fitting and outcome of a bilateral shoulder disarticulation amputee following targeted hyper-reinnervation nerve transfer surgery. In: Proceedings of MEC, UNB; 2005. p. 11–4.
  29. Paciga J, Richard P, Scott R. Error rate in five-state myoelectric control systems. Med Biol Eng. 1980;18:287–290
  30. Parker PA, Scott RN. Myoelectric control of prostheses. CRC Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1986;13:283–310
  31. Parker PA, Stuller J, Scott RN. Signal processing for the multistate myoelectric channel. Proc IEEE. 1977;65(5):662–674
  32. Parker P, Englehart K, Hudgins B. Control of powered upper limb prostheses. In:  Merletti R,  Parker P editor. Electromyography: physiology, engineering, and noninvasive applications. New York: IEEE Press; 2004;p. 453–475
  33. Reiter R. Eine neu elecktrokunstand. Grenzgeb Med. 1948;1(4):133–135
  34. Richard P, Gander R, Parker P, Scott RN. Multistate myoelectric control: the feasibility of 5-state control. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1983;20:84–86
  35. Saridis GN, Gootee T. EMG pattern analysis and classification for a prosthetic arm. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1982;2:403–409
  36. Schmidl H. The I.N.A.I.L. experience fitting upper-limb dysmelia patients with myoelectric control. Bull Prosthet Res. 1977;10(27):17–42
  37. Scott RN, Parker PA. Myoelectric prostheses: state of the art. J Med Eng Technol. 1988;12:143–151
  38. Vodovnik L, Kreifeldt J, Caldwell R, Green L, Silgalis E, Craig P. Some topics on myoelectric control of orthotic/prosthetic systems. Rep. EDC 4-67-17 1967, Case Western Reserve University.
  39. Weir R, Troyk P, DeMichele G, Lowery M, Kuiken T. Implantable myoelectric sensors (IMES). In: Proceedings of the MEC’05 conference, UNB; 2005. p. 93–7.

PII: S1050-6411(06)00102-7

doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.08.006

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 16, Issue 6 , Pages 541-548 , December 2006