Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 17, Issue 1 , Pages 80-89, February 2007

Co-contraction of the pronator teres and extensor carpi radialis during wrist extension movements in humans

  • Hiromi Fujii

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anatomy, Yamagata University School of Medicine, 2-2-2 Iida-Nishi, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan
  • ,
  • Shinji Kobayashi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yamagata University School of Medicine, 2-2-2 Iida-Nishi, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan
  • ,
  • Toshiaki Sato

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anatomy, Yamagata University School of Medicine, 2-2-2 Iida-Nishi, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan
  • ,
  • Katsuhiro Shinozaki

      Affiliations

    • Yamagata-Prefectural-Nihonkai Hospital, Sakata, Japan
  • ,
  • Akira Naito

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anatomy, Yamagata University School of Medicine, 2-2-2 Iida-Nishi, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Fax: +81 23 628 5205.

Received 10 June 2004; received in revised form 26 June 2005; accepted 18 November 2005. published online 07 March 2006.

Abstract 

In order to elucidate the functional significance of excitatory spinal reflex arcs (facilitation) between musculus (M.) pronator teres (PT) and M. extensor carpi radialis (ECR, longus: ECRL, brevis: ECRB) in humans, activities of the muscles were studied with electromyography (EMG) and electrical neuromuscular stimulation (ENS). In EMG study, activities of PT, ECRL, ECRB, and M. flexor carpi radialis during repetitive static (isometric) wrist extension and a series of a dynamic motion of wrist flexion/extension in the prone, semiprone, and supine positions of the forearm were recorded in 12 healthy human subjects. In the prone, semiprone, and supine positions, PT and ECR showed parallel activities during the static extension in all, eight, and eight subjects, respectively, and at the extension phase during the dynamic motion in all, eight and five subjects, respectively. These findings suggest that co-contraction of PT and ECR occurs during wrist extension movements at least with the prone forearm. The facilitation must be active during the co-contraction. In ENS study, ENS to PT was examined in 11 out of the 12 and that to ECRL was in the 12 subjects. Before ENS, the forearm was in the prone, semiprone, and supine positions. In all the subjects, ENS to PT induced a motion of forearm pronation to the maximum pronation. ENS to ECRL induced motions of wrist extension to the maximum extension and abduction (radial flexion) to 5–20 degrees of abduction regardless of the positions of the forearm. Moreover, it induced 30–80 degrees supination of the forearm from the prone position. Consequently, combined ENS to PT and ECRL resulted in motions of the extension and abduction while keeping the maximum pronation. These findings suggest that the co-contraction of PT and ECR during wrist extension movements occurs to prevent supinating the forearm. Forearm supination from the prone position should be added to one of the actions of ECRL.

Keywords: Pronator teres, Extensor carpi radialis, Heteronymous facilitation, Electromyography, Electrical neuromuscular stimulation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1050-6411(06)00007-1

doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.11.013

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume 17, Issue 1 , Pages 80-89, February 2007