Objective measurement of knee extension force based on computer adaptive testing

References 

1. Chaffin DB, Andersson GBJ, Martin BJ. Occupational biomechanics. 3rd ed.. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1999;p. 91–130
2. Cleary PD. Future directions of quality of life research. In:  Spilker B editors. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1996;p. 73–78
3. Dvir Z. Identification of feigned grip effort using isokinetic dynamometry. Clin Biomech. 1999;14:522–527
4. DuBois PH. A history of psychological testing. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 1970;
5. Hambelton RK, Swaminathan H, Rogers HJ. Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications; 1991;
6. Hambelton RK, Robin F, Xing D. Item response models for the analysis of educational and psychological test data. In:  Tinsley HE,  Brown S editor. Handbook of applied multivariate and mathematical modeling. New York: Academic Press; 2000;
7. Hays RD, Morales LS, Reise SP. Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Medical Care. 2000;38(Suppl. II):28–42
8. Levy M, Mizrahi J, Susak Z. Recruitment force and fatigue characteristics of quadriceps muscles of paraplegics isometrically activated by surface FES. J Biomed Eng. 1990;12:150–156
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
9. McHorney CA. Generic health measurement: past accomplishments and a measurement paradigm for the 21st century. Ann Int Med. 1997;127:743–750
10. Ware JE, Gandek BL, Keller SD. Evaluating instrument used cross-nationally: methods from the IQOLA Project. In:  Spilker B editors. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1996;p. 681–692
11. Weiss DJ. Adaptive testing by computer. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1985;53:774–789
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
12. White AA, Panjabi MM. Clinical biomechanics of the spine. 2nd ed.. Philadelphia,: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1991;p. 379–474