Muscle specificity in tests of cervical flexor muscle performance
Received 28 December 2004; received in revised form 24 August 2005; accepted 27 October 2005. published online 20 January 2006.
Abstract
The deep cervical flexor (DCF) muscles are considered to be of substantial clinical importance in the management of neck pain. While conventional cervical flexion (CF) dynamometry methods have been used frequently to assess the capacity of the cervical flexor muscles, it has been suggested that cranio-cervical flexion (CCF) methods may provide a more specific test of DCF muscle performance. This study compared the activation of the deep and superficial cervical flexor muscles between tests of isometric cranio-cervical flexion (CCF) and conventional cervical flexion (CF) dynamometry. Normalised root-mean-square values were recorded for the deep cervical flexor (DCF), sternocleidomastoid (SCM), anterior scalene (AS), and sternohyoid (SH) muscles during isometric CCF and CF tests at maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), 50% MVC, and 20% MVC in ten healthy volunteers. The results demonstrated significantly greater electromyography (EMG) amplitude for the SCM (P<.001–.002) and AS (P<.001–.001) muscles in the CF test conditions (MVC, 20%MVC, and 50%MVC) compared to CCF test conditions. Moreover, the SH muscle demonstrated significantly greater EMG amplitude during CF compared to CCF but only in the 50% MVC and 20% MVC conditions (P=.007 and .02 respectively). These results demonstrate that dynamometry tests of CF result in greater activity of the superficial cervical flexor muscles compared to tests of CCF. As a result, CCF dynamometry may provide a more specific method to assess and retrain DCF muscle performance, compared to conventional CF in which superficial muscle activity may mask impaired performance of the DCF muscles.